Former cricketer Kevin Pietersen criticized India captain Rohit Sharma for his poor performance in the second Test against England, calling his dismissal lazy and lacking urgency. Pietersen also expressed disappointment in Sharma’s approach, particularly in contrast to his explosive play in T20 cricket. This adds to Michael Vaughan’s criticisms of Sharma’s captaincy.
Legendary batter Kevin Pietersen had some harsh words for India captain Rohit Sharma after his dismal performance in the second Test against England in Visakhapatnam.
Rohit Sharma could not capitalise on the perfect batting conditions though and fell cheaply to debutant off-spinner Shoaib Bashir for 14 off 41 balls.
A report by cricket website CricTracker quoted former England captain Kevin Pietersen, who is part of the commentator’s panel for the five-match Test series, criticizing the India captain for failing to score under batting-friendly conditions.
“It doesn’t matter who you get out to, you can get out to anybody,” he was quoted saying in the CricTracker report. “I think he’d be kicking himself because there were plenty of runs to be had here. On this wicket, against a very young and inexperienced bowling attack, he will be looking at his dismissal and thinking, ‘How on earth did I get myself out here?’”
Kevin Pietersen added that Rohit Sharma played with a lazy approach.
“That (the dismissal) was quite lazy. Yes, it is instinctive to knock the ball towards the leg side. But there was no urgency in what led to the dismissal. There was no urgency to try and get off the strike,” he said.
Kevin Pietersen added, “These guys are expansive from ball one in T20 cricket, they play so beautifully. We have not seen huge spin, massive bounce, or anything that should pose any fear in the batter’s mind.”
It is pertinent to mention that Kevin Pietersen’s former teammate and captain Michael Vaughan had reportedly hit out at at Rohit Sharma’s leadership in the series opener in Hyderabad. In a column for the UK news agency The Telegraph, he rated the India captain’s captaincy as “average” in the game.
“I thought Rohit Sharma’s captaincy was very, very average. I thought he was so reactive, I don’t think he manoeuvred his field or was proactive with his bowling changes. And he didn’t have any answer to Ollie Pope’s sweeps or reverse sweeps,” he stated.
Related – Rohit Sharma gets trolled again and Vada Pav is not the reason!
Recently, former cricketer Kevin Pietersen made headlines by publicly criticizing Indian cricketer Rohit Sharma, using harsh language and straightforward words. Pietersen’s remarks have sparked a contentious debate within the cricketing community, as many dissect the implications of his comments.
Pietersen’s pointed critique of Sharma’s performance has ignited fervent discussions among fans and analysts alike. As a stalwart of the sport, Pietersen’s opinion carries weight and demands thoughtful consideration. However, it is imperative to acknowledge the complex dynamics at play within the realm of professional cricket.
Sharma, a prominent figure in the cricketing world, has consistently displayed exemplary prowess on the field, earning him admiration and respect from countless cricket enthusiasts. Hence, Pietersen’s scathing assessment begs deeper introspection into the criteria by which player performance is evaluated and judged.
In light of Pietersen’s outspoken remarks, it is essential to approach this discourse with nuance and understanding. While healthy criticism fosters growth and improvement, it is equally crucial to maintain a climate of respect and professionalism within the cricketing arena.
As this debate unfolds, it is paramount for all involved to uphold the integrity of the sport and its participants, emphasizing constructive dialogue and respectful engagement. Only through balanced and considerate conversation can the true essence of cricket be honored and upheld.
Source: ARY NEWS
Kevin Pietersen, former England captain, criticized India’s captain Rohit Sharma for his poor performance in the second Test against England. Pietersen remarked that Sharma failed to capitalize on favorable batting conditions and played with a lazy approach, lacking urgency in his dismissal. He also questioned Sharma’s mindset and proactive captaincy. Pietersen’s comments were echoed by Michael Vaughan, who labeled Sharma’s captaincy as “average” in the series opener. The criticism comes as Sharma faces scrutiny for his leadership and performance. The article highlights Pietersen and Vaughan’s remarks, shedding light on Sharma’s struggles in the Test series.
Disclaimer:
This content is AI-generated using IFTTT AI Content Creator. While we strive for accuracy, it’s a tool for rapid updates. We’re committed to filtering information, not reproducing or endorsing misinformation. – Khabristan.pk for more information visit privacy policy
Leave a Comment